.

Romney Wins GOP Primary Marked by Low Turnout

Middletown's Republicans had a weak showing at the polls Tuesday — so much so that the former Massachusetts governor's win was hardly a surprise. Republicans working at the polls had a few theories as to why.

Middletown poll workers outnumbered voters in Tuesday's Republican Primary in which the presumptive GOP Presidential candidate Mitt Romney sailed to victory.

Romney was declared the unofficial winner before 8:30 p.m. by the Associated Press, winning five New England states, including Delaware, Rhode Island and Connecticut.

The town clerk's tabulations took a bit longer. By 9 p.m., the unofficial word was Romney won, "by a lot," according to Sandra Russo-Driska. In all, 496 Republicans — or 14.5 percent — cast a vote: 274 for Romney, 94 for Ron Paul, 78 for Newt Gingrich, 47 for Rick Santorum and 3 for "uncommitted."

Absolutely no one voted at Snow School's 8th District.

See how each district broke down in the attached pdf.

A lot of poll workers caught up on some reading Tuesday. That's not to say they weren't working or eager for the city's 3,419 registered Republicans to cast their at any of Middletown's 14 districts — it's just that turnout was so low.

By noon, District 9 at led the polling locations in votes cast, according to the registrar of voters office — pulling in 24. In total, six hours into primary voting, 158 residents had run their ballots through the machines. By 3 p.m., said the city's total votes were 187 — or 5.47 percent of Republicans.

"We normally don’t do a big push for the primary," said Chair Ken McClellan, who cast his vote late in the afternoon. "We’ll remind people, but, given the large lead the Romney has at this point, I suspect that the turnout will be low. I’ve seen reports from New York and Delaware that turnout has been very low."

Stephen Gionfriddo, husband of the registrar, was moderator at Middletown High School’s 3rd and 6th Districts. By 12:40 p.m., he had “The Innocent” by David Balducci cracked open. “It’s dreadfully slow,” Gionfriddo said. “I mean there’s not really a lot of interest — once [Rick] Santorum dropped out — in Connecticut.”

“Gingrich is still in but he hasn’t put money into Connecticut,” Gionfriddo said. “Even Romney’s wife made an appearance [today at the Connecticut Republicans’ annual Prescott Bush Awards Dinner in Stamford], but there was no communication, no mailings.”

He says the state’s primary is too late this year. “I remember Reagan and Ford in 1976. They went right to the convention. That’s back when the primary really meant something.”

So few voters caused Gionfriddo to ruminate about other countries whose voting rights are much more sacred. “It’s kind of a shame to see everything taken for granted and nobody can be bothered.”

Over at Spencer School shortly afterward, moderator Ed Dypa reported 6 votes out of 47 for the 2nd District and 8 out of 130 for the 13th District. He and Tony Gaunichau, who together have worked the polls for nearly 40 years, had wondered at the lack of foot traffic.

“It’s most likely people think Romney is a shoo-in type of thing,” Dypa said. “I think people see all these primaries beforehand and see such a large edge like Romney has and figure, ‘this is it.’”

Normally, there’s a rush between 6 and 8 a.m., Dypa said, as a poll worker yelled to the eight others in the gymnasium, not one a voter, “seven hours!” This year, three Republicans showed up at Spencer during the first two hours.

At 3 p.m., Macdonough School had 6 votes registered on its ballot machine, in the 1st District, which has about 189 Republicans. “As a moderator for the past 32 years, I would say this is pathetic,” Earle V. Roberts said. “In part I blame the media. In the primaries in the last 30 years [in Middletown], voter registration is going higher.”

“The primary is not public enough,” agreed Juan Montalvo. Both men say the media failed to get the word out to Republican voters that today is Connecticut’s primary day. “The media can be instrumental,” Roberts said.

It also can mislead voters, Roberts said. He pointed to a Hartford Courant story from Monday, that gave Republicans the impression that the primary was already clinched. "With candidates dropping out or sharply cutting back their campaigns, Republican front-runner Mitt Romney is expected to cruise to victory Tuesday in Connecticut's presidential primary," the story reads.

“It’s sad, when in Iraq and other third-world countries, people dipping their finger in ink [to vote] will be shot for it,” Roberts said. “And the registrar,” who he thinks is paid to encourage voting, “doesn’t do enough of what she should do.”

Montalvo puts the blame on the Secretary of the State. “I think the state should be obligated to inform people primary day is so-and-so.”

Roberts said the long lead-up to the GOP primary on the national level is exhausting to primary voters. “After two, three, four years of promises, after a while even I get sick of it.” He said perhaps England and other such countries who only primary for 60 days total should be looked up to.

Here in Middletown, “We had way too many candidates that hung on for way too long,” Montalvo said.

Follow us on Twitter or like us on Facebook.
Sign up for the Middletown Patch newsletter here.

John Brush April 25, 2012 at 01:33 AM
I voted at 6PM at Spencer School (districts 2 and 13) and by that time there had been 18 voters in my district and 9 in the other. I disagree with the notion that turnout was so low because of insufficient publicity about the date of the primary. Anyone with half a brain should have known that April 25 was Connecticut's Republican primary election. Probably the barrage of news that Romney was the nearly certain nominee made the effort to vote seem futile to many Republicans.
William Wilson April 25, 2012 at 01:52 AM
I think it was slow because Santorum dropped out 10 days. Most folks see it between Romney and president Obama now that is why the turnout was low. It won't be low come November and that is when it counts.
Fred Young April 25, 2012 at 02:41 AM
Sad, sad, sad, that Mitt Romney is the best the Reps can put up against OB. I do not want either one. But given a choice between a proven disappointment & a probable disappointment, I will have a tough decision, maybe vote 3rd party again.
luna para April 25, 2012 at 10:48 AM
When there is little choice, when all the politicians seem to be cut out of the same mold, there is little urgency to choose which one is the least offensive.
Jay April 25, 2012 at 12:27 PM
Maybe people are waking up to the fact that the contenders, who are propagandized through our corporate-owned media, will only serve the special interest groups who finance their campaigns, rather than "We, The People."

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »